“I believe in life. I believe in
human beings. I am the enemy of anything that deprives anyone of life.” These
words by writer and pacifist Kenneth Patchen are as important in reference to
current affairs in the Middle East today as they were to the atrocities of the
Third Reich. Because of the moral importance of the preservation of human life,
we must consider the best approach for our nation to take in regard to human
rights abuses internationally.
Currently, United States spending
to aid Israel is quite substantial. This money is given in the form of grants
that are claimed to benefit Israeli society, but can actually hinder
development because of the strings attached. The money must be spent on
American weapons, and it is estimated that because of the rise in acquisition
costs, the grants actually cost the Israeli people up to 600 million dollars.
There are three main reasons that
the current spending is unacceptable.
First, the money coming from the
U.S. is often used in pursuit of violence in the region that is entirely
unnecessary.
Second, Israel’s current actions
are in direct violation of international laws that the U.S. supports.
And lastly, Israel is entirely
capable of supporting itself without aid.
According to Amnesty International
on August 4, 2014, since July 8 of this year 1400 Palestinians have been
killed. This includes at least 252 children.
While there are very real threats
for the safety of Israeli citizens, current initiatives are doing nothing to
protect them. The people really being targeted by “counter-terrorism” are
innocent civilians of the Gaza strip, not those affiliated with organizations
such as Hamas. Indiscriminate bombings and overly enthusiastic displays of
military power do nothing to defend against attacks, they only succeed in
further loss of life, injury, and destruction.
The next issue to discuss is the
blatant disregard for international law that has been illustrated repeatedly.
A January 31, 2013 article
published by the New York Times discusses the issue.
The Geneva Conventions, which the
United States fully supports, prohibit the transfer of civilian populations
into occupied territory.
Israeli citizens have been
incentivized to buy property in such territories, and have thus shown the lack
of authority they find in these laws.
International laws such as those
laid out in the Geneva Conventions are not made so that countries can choose
which best suit their interest; the agreements made must be upheld and any
action that the U.S. government takes to help in the violation of these laws
works directly against its own interests.
Many argue that these problems are
necessary in order preserve Israel’s economy and military dominance, which
leads to my next point regarding Israel’s complete ability to defend itself.
David Bandow of the CATO Institute
has discussed this issue in detail. The fact of the matter is that Israel has a
powerful economy that is largely driven by its hi-tech sector. It is not
economically weak and is in fact the most powerful military entity in its
region. There are minor problems in the economy, but in relation to those of
the United States they are very insignificant.
Because of the violence done by the
Israeli military without justifiable goals, the disregard for international
law, and the lack of necessity for US dollars, it is clear that funding should
cease.
Bibliography
Life in Occupied Palestine: Eyewitness
Stories and Photos, Anna
Baltzer, CJME, 2005, film.
Israel/OPT: International Criminal
Court key to breaking cycle of injustice for war crimes, Amnesty International, August 14, 2014. Web.
Cumming-Bruce, Nick. “U.N. Panel Says Israeli
Settlement Policy Violates Law” The New
York Times. Print. January 31, 2013.
Bondow, Doug.
“The Case for Ending Aid to Israel.” CATO
Institute. Web. June 5, 2012.
Stringer. Smoke and flames are seen following what police
said was an Israeli air strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. 2014. The Nation.
Web. July 9, 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.